NSW neighbours facing a nearby development application
Send the DA documents. We test the applicant's own stated figures — height, floor space, setbacks, parking, landscaping, solar access, zoning, overlays — against the applicable LEP, DCP and SEPP controls, and cite the exact clause for every finding. Two ways this ends:
You get a clause-cited grounds table plus a draft submission to review and lodge yourself — within 5 business days.
Illustrative format · every ground cites its clause and the DA page it came from
You get a plain-English explanation of why — and every cent back within 24 hours. No arguments.
The refund promise is the trust mechanism, not a marketing line.
What the screen tests
Below is the format of the grounds table — every line cites the exact clause and the page of the DA document. Example values are illustrative, not a real assessment.
| Control tested | Clause cited | Applicant's figure | Finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building height | LEP cl 4.3 — max 8.5m | 9.2m (DA p.14) | GROUND Exceeds by 0.7m |
| Front setback | DCP cl 3.2 — 6m min | 6.0m (DA p.22) | COMPLIANT |
| Deep soil area | DCP cl 5.1 — 25% min | 18% (DA p.31) | GROUND 7 points short |
| Solar access | DCP cl 6.4 — 3h to living areas | Compliant (DA p.40) | COMPLIANT |
Illustrative example of the report format — not a real DA assessment. Reports are produced by qualified contract town planners working to a fixed public-instrument rubric. Never automated verdicts; never "AI says you'll win."
How it works
Upload the DA documents — or just the DA number, council, and site address. Before payment we confirm the DA is still on exhibition and check the address against our coverage and exclusion areas.
The applicant's stated figures are tested against the applicable LEP, DCP and SEPP controls: height, FSR, setbacks, parking, deep soil and landscaped area, separation and solar access, permissibility, heritage and flood overlays, exhibition compliance.
If supportable grounds exist, you get a clause-cited grounds table plus a draft submission for you to review and lodge yourself — within 5 business days.
If the check finds nothing worth objecting to, you get a plain-English explanation of why — and every cent back within 24 hours. We'd rather lose the fee than sell you a hopeless objection.
Some cases turn on judgement calls no screen can automate — neighbourhood character, view sharing. If yours is one of them, we tell you and refund you rather than sell you a report that can't do the job. We make no success-rate claims of any kind; be wary of anyone who does.
Pricing
Planning consultants charge ~$1,200+ for full objection submissions. MeritCheck is the cited screen you run first — before you spend the big money, or instead of it.
Full clause-cited merit check, grounds table + draft submission if merit exists — or plain-English explanation + full refund within 24h if it doesn't. Delivered within 5 business days.
Check a DA · $149Same cited check per household address. Neighbours objecting to the same DA each get their own report at the group rate.
Check a DA · $119 eaScope
FAQ
Clause-cited. Refund-backed. If there's nothing worth objecting to, you'll know — and you won't pay for the privilege of finding out.